On Sat, Jan 10, 2004 at 03:21:16AM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Thu, 8 Jan 2004 14:54:07 -0500, Branden Robinson <email@example.com> said: > > > On Sun, Jan 04, 2004 at 03:58:28PM +0000, Andrew M.A. Cater wrote: > >> Acroread can't be distributed - Adobe changed the licence > >> conditions under which their Acrobat reader could be distributed. > > > I confess I have to wonder how many people who are inclined to vote > > in favor of retaining non-free do so to preserve our users' access > > to software that isn't actually in it. > > Yes, your opposition is obviously stupid and ignorant, and > liable to take such funny and idiotic stances. > > This is getting to be quite droll. Do you ever tire of attacking straw men? I fear the answer is no, but I'd rather ask than assume -- a courtesy you seldom see fit to afford me. -- G. Branden Robinson | Measure with micrometer, Debian GNU/Linux | mark with chalk, firstname.lastname@example.org | cut with axe, http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | hope like hell.
Description: Digital signature