Re: one of the many reasons why removing non-free is a dumb idea
> > Well, except John Goerzen has suggested that the proposal he is discussing
> > is the one he proposed three years ago. [Which was the context of my
> > above paragraph.]
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 02:30:43PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> I didn't mean to suggest that. You had told me that I should provide a
> proposal for the ideas I'm discussing. My reply was simply to say "I
> alreaded, and it's over here." I'm not working to resurrect that
> particular proposal presently.
If I understand you correctly [and there's a very good chance that I do
not understand you correctly], you are advocating ideas from a proposal
you don't wish to advocate?
Or maybe you are in the process of proposing something else, but that's
not ready yet, so instead we're talking about this other proposal?
Or maybe ...
I really do not understand what it is you're trying to do, nor why.
--
Raul
Reply to: