Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 09:07:22AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 04:06:15PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote:
> > Why this is all nice and true, I fail to see the point why the
> > documentation absolutely needs to be on an APT source with debian.org in
> > it.
>
> Because non-debianized stuff on debian boxes is evil :))
What do you call 'debianized' in this context? A Debian package?
Something lying around on a Debian server? Something done by an offcial
DD?
Michael
Reply to: