Re: The "Free" vs. "Non-Free" issue
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:03:20AM -0500, Raul Miller wrote:
> By the way, doc-rfc is an example of a package in non-free which is
> useful to some people. If a person is doing network development, they're
> likely to need this documentation and [because someone doing network
> development often needs to be disconnected from the stable internet]
> having the documentation packaged and available locally would be useful.
Why this is all nice and true, I fail to see the point why the
documentation absolutely needs to be on an APT source with debian.org in
it.
Michael
Reply to: