[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [AMENDMENT BR1] GR: Disambiguation of Section 4.1.5 of the constitution



On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 12:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote:

> 	Uhh, I have lost track.  I need to go into the archive ans see
>  who has seconded what, unless someone beats me to it.

I based this upon your message here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00036.html

>  Branden's alternate
>     Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org>
>    "John H. Robinson, IV" <jaqque@debian.org>
>     Bob Hilliard <hilliard@debian.org>
>     Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl>
>     Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>
> 
>   We are almost there with this proposal too, all we need is one DD to
>   sign on to this.

My key is not in the Debian keyring, nor does it have a trust path to
it, so I have not verified the signatures. Yeah, I need to fix that. Nor
have I even verified there are DD's by these names.

However, here are archive URLs to the messages, to hopefully make the
Secretary's life easier:

      * Branden Robinson
        <branden@debian.org>http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00025.html
      * Bob Hilliard <hilliard@debian.org>
        http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00027.html
      * Richard Braakman
        <dark@xs4all.nl>http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00029.html
      * Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> 
        http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00031.html
      * "John H. Robinson, IV"
        <jaqque@debian.org>http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00033.html
      * Steve Langasek <vorlon@netexpress.net> 
        http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00051.html
      * Jochen Voss
        <voss@seehuhn.de>http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200309/msg00058.html

I see Branden and 6 seconds. So it looks like we might of had enough
seconds a while ago, if we only needed 5.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: