Re: [AMENDMENT BR2] GR: Disambiguation of Section 4.1.5 of the constitution

[ucko@debian.org (Aaron M. Ucko)]

Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> writes:

>         Yes, it was. I did include the supercession language later on
>  in the document, but forgot it at the top of clause 5.

This version also looks fine modulo one spelling nit: forms of
"supersede" are traditionally spelled with Ss, not Cs.

-- 
Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org)
Finger amu@monk.mit.edu (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.