Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial)

To: debian-vote@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial)
From: David Coe <davidc@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Dec 2003 19:57:50 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 868ykwmodt.fsf@someotherplace.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20031227062747.GC2285@suffields.me.uk> (Andrew Suffield's message of "Sat, 27 Dec 2003 06:27:47 +0000")
References: <[🔎] 20031227062747.GC2285@suffields.me.uk>

Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org> writes:

> New text:
>
> 5. Programs that do not meet our free software standards
>
> We acknowledge that some of our users require the use of works that
> don't conform to the Debian Free Software Guidelines. ...

I think (to be consistent, and avoid a possible source of
confusion/contention), this section title should say 'Works'
rather than 'Programs'

5. Works that do not meet our free software standards


Thanks.

Reply to:

References:
- Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial)
  - From: Andrew Suffield <asuffield@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Re: GR: Removal of non-free
Next by Date: Re: GR: Removal of non-free
Previous by thread: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial)
Next by thread: Re: Candidate social contract amendments (part 1: editorial) (2nd draft)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread