Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting

[Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org>]

On Nov 2, 2003, at 17:09, Raul Miller wrote:

> On the other hand, if there really four *orthogonal* issues, then maybe
> there should be four ballots.  It's only when the issues are 
> intertwined
> that it makes sense to put them on the same ballot.

That's really all I'm saying.