Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
On Sun, Nov 02, 2003 at 08:22:50AM -0500, I wrote:
>  I don't see that there's any reason at all to agree that voting
> "further discussion" on irrelevant amendments is an insincere choice.
>  I agree with Manoj, that if the secretary deems the ammendment to
> be orthogonal to the vote that the secretary has the power to put it on
> a separate ballot.
 The trivial "defense" against this "tactic" is to propose a new
amendment that combines both the original option and this new option.
This addresses the cases where the amendment is relevant and perhaps,
in some people's eyes, a better idea than the original proposal.