On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 10:49:29PM -0600, Manoj Srivastava wrote: > On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 23:38:41 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis <asd@suespammers.org> said: > > No. It can cause C to win by removing A and B from the running for > > no good reason. That's the problem. > > Only if such ballots are deemed proper procedure. I reviewed what I thought were the applicable clauses of the Constitution in my original message in this subthread[1]. There doesn't appear to be anything to prevent such ballots from being prepared, apart from self-restraint on the part of the developers from proposing orthogonal (what I've been calling "irrelevant") amendments to a proposal. Obviously what we are exploring here is what happens if and when that self-restraint fails. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200310/msg00168.html -- G. Branden Robinson | Reality is what refuses to go away Debian GNU/Linux | when I stop believing in it. branden@debian.org | -- Philip K. Dick http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature