Re: GRs, irrelevant amendments, and insincere voting
On Sat, 1 Nov 2003 23:38:41 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis <email@example.com> said:
> On Nov 1, 2003, at 22:43, Matthias Urlichs wrote:
>> In general, though, I have to admit that I don't understand what
>> the problem is. A.6.3 ranks your choice against the defaukt option,
>> not against anything else. Thus, voting CDAB instead of CABD
>> doesn't affect the chances of C winning, it only changes the
>> chances of A or B winning if C isn't accepted by the
> No. It can cause C to win by removing A and B from the running for
> no good reason. That's the problem.
Only if such ballots are deemed proper procedure.
"And they told us, what they wanted... Was a sound that could kill
some-one, from a distance." Kate Bush
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C