Re: Constitutional amendment: Condorcet/Clone Proof SSD vote tallying
On Thu, 12 Jun 2003 00:48:13 +1000, Hamish Moffatt <hamish@debian.org> said:
> I have serious concerns about this ballot. John Robinson's proposed
> amendment has been rejected by Manoj so according to the
> constitution it should be voted on. Further it seems to address some
> real problems in the new proposed system.
Have you missed:
======================================================================
A.1. Discussion and Amendment
1. Following the proposal, the resolution may be discussed.
Amendments may be made formal by being proposed and sponsored
according to the requirements for a new resolution, or directly by
the proposer of the original resolution.
4.2. Procedure
1. The Developers follow the Standard Resolution Procedure, below. A
resolution or amendment is introduced if proposed by any Developer
and sponsored by at least K other Developers, or if proposed by
the Project Leader or the Technical Committee.
======================================================================
Now, as far as I can tell, John Robinson is not the Project
leader, or on the technical committee, so there was no formal
amendment to vote upon.
manoj
--
Any clod can have the facts, but having opinions is an Art. Mencken
[Having the facts is hard. --ed]
Manoj Srivastava <srivasta@debian.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
Reply to: