Re: Better quorum change proposal, with justifiction
Hi,
Sam Hartman wrote:
> And if you proposed a new name for it that accurately characterized
> what it was and removed some confusion, I might second such a
> proposal. I might also decide it wasn't worth the bother.
"Approvals".
I think that word works well; we already have established that ranking an
option WRT the default option is equivalent to checking (or not) that option
on an approval ballot.
There's not much difference between adding a sentence which states that the
word "quorum", as used in the proposal / the constitution, is not used with
its commonly-accepted meaning, and defining our usage of the word
"approvals".
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | smurf@smurf.noris.de
Disclaimer: The quote was selected randomly. Really. | http://smurf.noris.de
--
1 + 1 = 3, for large values of 1.
Reply to: