Re: Better quorum change proposal, with justifiction
Sam Hartman wrote:
>
> I think I'm willing to agree with you here that quorum is not a great
> name for what we have in Manoj's proposal.
i also got hung up on the use of the word ``quorum''.
at first, i saw the word quorum, and i saw that that was not at all what
was going on. i assumed that the people initially drafting the system
meant quorum, not some ``buy-in'' thing. so i crafted an amendment that
restored the meaning of quorum to quorum.
it also brought us closer to a Condorcet/Cloneproof SSD method of
tallying.
after pondering, i came up with another idea tht gives us a pure
Condorcet/Cloneproof SSD, provides with applicable buy-in, and supports
supermajorities. please see
http://lists.debian.org/debian-vote/2003/debian-vote-200305/msg00203.html
Message-id: <20030527054409.GA6322@ucsd.edu>
-john
Reply to: