Re: question about DPL election results
On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:29:15AM -0500, Daniel Burrows <firstname.lastname@example.org> was heard to say:
> On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 09:25:58AM +0200, Jochen Voss <email@example.com> was heard to say:
> > On Fri, Apr 04, 2003 at 08:57:50AM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote:
> > > fre 2003-04-04 klockan 08.23 skrev Jochen Voss:
> > > > But there is no such number. So my question is: who did not meet
> > > > quorum? How can I see this from the tally table?
> > >
> > > You have to look at (X,5) - (5,X), which gives you:
> > How this? Do you have any references? I do not find such a
> > rule, neither in current constitution nor in the current voting
> > amendment draft.
> From the section of the constitution quoted earlier, the quorum is
> the number of people who must prefer an option to the default option.
...of course, this only applies to the winner, but presumably the
scripts did the calculation for everyone and ignored the results for all
the non-winning options.
/-------------------- Daniel Burrows <firstname.lastname@example.org> -------------------\
| Almost Winter, Winter, Still Winter, and Construction. |
\------- (if (not (understand-this)) (go-to http://www.schemers.org)) --------/