On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 02:08:41PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > I'm sorry, I didn't follow the special casing you do for "superdefeats". > False: once again you're eliminating a defeat of an option involved > in a superdefeat, but the proposal requires that the superdefeated > option be eliminated instead. Thus: > F superdefeats A 60:40 > A defeats B 50:10 > B defeats F 50:10 > C defeats F 50:10 > A defeats C 40:20 > B defeats C 40:20 > eliminate A Ah. Same thing still applies though, all you need is some way to make the B versus C defeat eliminated before you do whatever special casing you have. 40 A B C F 10 A C B F 10 F C B A F superdefeats A 60:40 (scaled 3:1) B defeats F 50:10 C defeats F 50:10 A defeats B 50:10 A defeats C 50:10 B defeats C 40:20 eliminate weakest defeat, BdC; eliminate A; you're left with B defeats F, C defeats F, A eliminated, so B and C draw. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''
Attachment:
pgpBoHXVL9gMv.pgp
Description: PGP signature