[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Hybrid Theory



On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 03:52:13PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> If you want a more complicated example, try:
> 	40 A B C F  (A requires 3:1 supermajority, F is the default option)
> 	10 C B F A
> 	10 F C B A
> which Condorcet would rank as A first, B second, C third and F last;
> but under Hybrid would be treated as:
> 	F defeats A (60:40) (scaled 3:1 from 20:40)
> 	C defeats F (50:10)
> 	B defeats F (50:10)
> 	A defeats B (40:20) <--- every defeat below this one must be dropped
> 	B defeats C (40:20)
> 	A defeats C (40:20)
> with the three weakest defeats eliminated, leaving F defeats A, C defeats
> F, B defeats F, and a draw between B and C.

I'm sorry, I didn't follow the special casing you do for "superdefeats".
Here's the corrected example:

 	40 A B C F  (A requires 3:1 supermajority, F is the default option)
 	10 C B F A
 	10 F C A B

	F defeats A (60:40) (scaled 3:1 from 20:40)
	C defeats F (50:10)
	B defeats F (50:10)
	A defeats B (50:10) <--- every defeat below this one must be dropped
	B defeats C (40:20)
	A defeats C (40:20)

AdC gets dropped since it's weakest and involves A; BdC gets dropped
since it's weakest; then AdB gets dropped since it's equal weakest and
involves A.

Cheers,
aj

-- 
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.

 ``If you don't do it now, you'll be one year older when you do.''

Attachment: pgpwxzCDIhMOj.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: