Re: General Resolution draft against spam.
>>"Sven" == Sven Luther <email@example.com> writes:
Sven> Well, manoj, the only problem is that when you filter spam, you do it
Sven> after having paid for the download of the spam over a possibly slow and
Sven> expensive modem connection.
Quit. So th solution is to apply spam filtering upstream --
and to improve the spam filtering that is used.
We already use spamassassin, but that may not be enough. I
suggest we use crm114, which is better than bogofilter (since it uses
more than just word counts).
The answer is not to treat legitimate users like dirt, and
force them to use the subscribe address (my subscribe address is
never the address I post from).
Ever feel like life was a game and you had the wrong instruction
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C