Re: General Resolution draft against spam.
>>"Sven" == Sven Luther <email@example.com> writes:
Sven> To avoid spam in debian lists:
Sven> - Being able to post is a privilege, not a right. The natural way of
Sven> obtaining this privilege, for so called "open" lists, is by
Sven> to them and using the same address in the From: field, or by using
Sven> an email addresses which has been previously subscribed to a special
Sven> white list.
That would preclude gettting mail from me, and people with
similar mail setups as mine. My subscribe address is a mail bounce
address, which remains constant, as I move. My Outbound address
reflects th current ISP arrangement.
Sven> No other mail will reach the lists until it's approved by a moderator
Sven> If there are no moderators for a given list, these mails will go to
Sven> /dev/null (so to speak).
More work, and also delays, for the innocent.
Sven> This was the last item of the proposal, and maybe one of the most
Sven> strongly objected too, both now and in the past.
Sven> The debian mailing lists are open, and we want them to stay that way.
Sven> Using spamassassin on the lists, will lower the quantity of spam a lot
Sven> (just check your spamassassin cache and count the mail in it, and you
Sven> will be convinced), and thus satisfy the people wanting this kind of
Sven> extreme measures.
Quite. Why not augment spamassassin with content based filters?
"For a male and female to live continuously together is...
biologically speaking, an extremely unnatural condition." Robert
Manoj Srivastava <firstname.lastname@example.org> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C