[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying

On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 01:56:41AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > > > OTOH, so far none of this has mattered:
> > > "Past performance is no guarantee of future results."
> > 
> > Sure, I figured most people would draw the same conclusions themselves,
> > given the data.
> I see no evidence that people's opinions are leaning one way or the
> other, yet.

For whatever it's worth: I think that the voting geeks recommendations
make sense and I think that fixing a bug in our voting system--even
one who's effect is statistically improbable--is a worthwhile use of
our time. I support moving forward with this.

B. Mako Hill

Attachment: pgpoYTV0sTGCc.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: