[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFD: Reviving Constitutional amendment: Smith/Condorcet vote tallying

>>>>> "Branden" == Branden Robinson <branden@debian.org> writes:

    Branden> On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 09:29:31AM +1000, Anthony Towns
    Branden> wrote:
    >> On Mon, Aug 26, 2002 at 03:00:52PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
    >> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:13:04AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
    >> > > OTOH, so far none of this has mattered: > "Past performance
    >> is no guarantee of future results."
    >> Sure, I figured most people would draw the same conclusions
    >> themselves, given the data.

    Branden> I see no evidence that people's opinions are leaning one
    Branden> way or the other, yet.

O, you want me toos?  Seems like fixing the issue is worth the effort
and seems like voting on the recommendations is worth doing.

I followed the discussion and didn't really see anything that required
comments; the summaries were fairly good.

Reply to: