Re: [PROPOSED] Michael Bramer must stop spamming or be expelled
On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Oct 2001, Sven wrote:
>
> > I received a german translation of on of my packages description, and after
> > having read it, i communicated with the translator and together we found a
> > better translation. Also i did change the english description following to
> > this discution, as i noticed some things could be improved there also.
>
> > So, at least something usefull as come of those mails, altough i agree with
> > others that wouldn't know what to do with a japanese or rusian translation.
>
> > Also, for those who complain, procmail is your friend, ...
>
> Please, let no one suggest further that procmail is a solution here. This is
> tantamount to admitting that these messages *are* equivalent to Spam -- that
> because the recipient has the technical means to filter out the messages, they
> have no cause for complaint. But the burden should not be on the recipient to
> make the system work the way it needs to, it should be on the sender of the
> messages.
>
> I was among those who argued initially that the maintainer needs to be kept in
> the loop, and should therefore receive the translations. But clearly, there
> are maintainers who don't share this view, and they are (rightfully) upset
> that they have to repeatedly ask, for every new package they upload, to be
> excluded from the notifications. For the sake of the DDTS itself, a technical
> solution should be found that lets developers opt out if they feel they have
> nothing to contribute to the translation process, and that lets everyone get
> back to work. Infighting among developers takes the focus away from both free
> software and our users, and telling dozens of developers[1] to shove off and
> use procmail if they don't like the state of things is just the sort of
> reaction that would encourage infighting.
opt in opt in opt in opt in opt in opt in opt in opt in opt in opt in opt in
Reply to: