[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Condorcet Voting and Supermajorities (Re: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Disambiguation of 4.1.5)

On Sat, Dec 02, 2000 at 01:07:26AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> "Status-quo" means don't resolve *anything*. There are at most two
> ways of doing that: by doing nothing, and not even discussing the
> matter again, and by doing nothing constructive, but continuing to
> flame each other. I personally don't think that's a distinction
> that'll be successfully determined by a vote, though.

I disagree.

Status-quo in the context of supermajority means don't do anything that
requires supermajority.  That can still leave a lot of options.


Reply to: