On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 07:04:02AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Which sheds a great deal of light on the motivations behind his "amendment"
> to John Goerzen's proposal.
Which was to be handled by having two votes, which would've required,
initially, a simple majority in favour of John's proposal, then a 3:1 vote
(assuming a supermajority was required for it to pass) in favour for it
to succeed.
Are you making these random snide comments about scare-quoted "amendments"
because you actually believe them, or just to get a reaction, btw?
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``Thanks to all avid pokers out there''
-- linux.conf.au, 17-20 January 2001
Attachment:
pgptItvKEnra7.pgp
Description: PGP signature