Re: current ballot must be withdrawn per Constitution A.5
On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:42:17PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> It also scares me that people seem to be extending the Secretary's
> power to "interpret" the constitution to "amend the Constitution
> whenever he feels like it."
>
> I repeat again:
>
> THERE IS NO PROVISION IN THE CONSTITUTION FOR REQUIRING A
> SUPERMAJORITY FOR THIS GR.
>
> How can the Secretary interpret something that is absent?
There was a proposal in a previous thread to require a 3/1
majority on such documents I believe. Would it not make
sense to vote on that proposal in order to determine if a
3/1 vote is actually supported by Debian developers?
Cheers,
Shane
--
Shane Wegner: shane@cm.nu
http://www.cm.nu/~shane/
PGP: 1024D/FFE3035D
A0ED DAC4 77EC D674 5487
5B5C 4F89 9A4E FFE3 035D
Reply to: