[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: PROPOSED: [CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT] Alternate disambiguation of 4.1.5


On Tue, Oct 10, 2000 at 12:32:00PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote:
> It seems to me that a 3:1 majority is exceedingly excessive; requiring
> 75% of people to agree seems to me to be an unreasonably high limit.
We talk about changing our constitution! 3:1 is by no means too high.



Reply to: