Re: Non-Constitutional Voting Procedure
On Fri, Sep 29, 2000 at 06:24:54PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > You can't because it ain't there. The only thing the constitution says
> > about any of this is that the secretary may make a decision. Apparently,
> > that decision need not be otherwise constitutional. I don't believe this
> > was intended. I don't believe it's right. And I'll be damned if I'm
> > going to simply ignore this precedent.
>
> Oh, the secretary's decision can be overridden. You don't need to
> argue that it's unconstitutional, you just need to pass the relevant
> GR, or amendment, or whatever is appropriate, to cause the precedent
> to be overridden.
The vote wouldn't take place until after this one was finished, making it
somewhat a moot point, would it not?
--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org> GnuPG key 1024D/DCF9DAB3
Debian GNU/Linux (http://www.debian.org/) 20F6 2261 F185 7A3E 79FC
The QuakeForge Project (http://quakeforge.net/) 44F9 8FF7 D7A3 DCF9 DAB3
<knghtbrd> (tinc)
<Espy> (ytitac)
<knghtbrd> (ntinac)
<Espy> (it)
<knghtbrd> (in)
* Espy notes talking in acr^Winitialisms is scary when the other side
understands you
Reply to: