On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 09:10:47PM -0400, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 05:22:43PM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote:
> > The intention of this ammendment is to provide a means for developers to
> > offer their support of the existing social contract while acknowledging
> > that the current situation does indeed give somewhat too much credibility.
Hmm. The words "...to non-free software" or something similar should've
appeared at the end of that sentence.
> I'm afraid I cannot parse this sentence. I don't understand how you can
> have too much "credibility".
Pick some other word if you prefer it then, umm, "equality", "respect",
maybe "acceptance".
Cheers,
aj
--
Anthony Towns <aj@humbug.org.au> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/>
I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred.
``We reject: kings, presidents, and voting.
We believe in: rough consensus and working code.''
-- Dave Clark
Attachment:
pgpGaMpqcmvQD.pgp
Description: PGP signature