I could rediscribe the method but I couldn't make changes as large as what were suggested without going through the formal change process for the constitution. On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 07:27:43PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > > On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Branden Robinson wrote: > > > I should point out that leaving this issue unresolved makes it possible for > > people to raise a legitimate challenge to our voting procedure, since the > > present description avails itself of multiple interpretations of the same > > set of ballots. > > I agree with Branden. It would be good if Darren codified the exact > current vote counting system and we made that the authoritative measure. I > don't think this would need updating the constitution or the like.. > > Jason > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-request@lists.debian.org > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org > > -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. * http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< * * Debian: Software in the Public Interest: * * Project Secretary Treasurer * * Webmaster Team * * BTS Team siteROCK: * * Lintian Team Linux Infrastructure Engineer *
Attachment:
pgpTyCh0Yy1U8.pgp
Description: PGP signature