[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: It isn't quite Condorcet's method.

I could rediscribe the method but I couldn't make changes as large as what
were suggested without going through the formal change process for the

On Mon, Jun 12, 2000 at 07:27:43PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Jun 2000, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > I should point out that leaving this issue unresolved makes it possible for
> > people to raise a legitimate challenge to our voting procedure, since the
> > present description avails itself of multiple interpretations of the same
> > set of ballots.
> I agree with Branden. It would be good if Darren codified the exact
> current vote counting system and we made that the authoritative measure. I
> don't think this would need updating the constitution or the like.. 
> Jason
> --  
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also.
* http://benham.net/index.html        <gecko@benham.net>           <><  *
* Debian:                             Software in the Public Interest:  *
*   Project Secretary                   Treasurer                       *
*   Webmaster Team                                                      *
*   BTS Team                          siteROCK:                         *
*   Lintian Team                        Linux Infrastructure Engineer   *

Attachment: pgpTyCh0Yy1U8.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: