[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Negative Summary of the Split Proposal



On Mon, Jul 05, 1999 at 03:04:04AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> > I will withdraw my objections in a heartbeat if I know that the
> > implementation details of this proposal Wichert chose not to write
> > about won't result in hiding non-free and making it difficult to get
> > at.
> 
> At the moment I don't intend to propose or suggest that we remove all
> references to non-free software from the webpages. That would be a
> disservice to our users. It's also a bit unrelated: I don't want to hide
> non-free, I want have it somewhere seperate and clearly seperate from
> the rest of the archive.
> 
> Removing all references to non-free packages from the webpages strikes
> me as hiding possibly useful information, which is not something we
> should do. Pretending something isn't there or ignoring not is not going
> to help us. Making a great free distribution will.

Then I withdraw my objections...  My issue is resolved.

--
Joseph Carter <knghtbrd@debian.org>            Debian GNU/Linux developer
PGP: E8D68481E3A8BB77 8EE22996C9445FBE            The Source Comes First!
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
<Culus> Ben: Do you solumly swear to read you debian email once a day and
        do not permit people to think you are MIA?
<Ben> Culus: i do so swear

Attachment: pgpRmOahWnFhu.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: