[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Telnet



On Mon, Dec 04, 2023 at 08:04:40PM +0100, Nicolas George wrote:
> tomas@tuxteam.de (12023-12-04):
> > Which, in the case of interaction with HTTP (and most others) actually
> > comes in handy. Those explicit \r\n get old pretty fast...
> 
> Just hope you will not need to emit a LATIN SMALL LETTER Y WITH
> DIAERESIS in ISO-8859-1.

Most definitely :-)

> Anyway, the treatment done by telnet is not bad per se, provided we know
> (1) that they happen, (2) if we need them in our use case and (3) how to
> turn them off. I guess most people who use telnet as a general network
> client do not know either (1) nor (2) nor (3).

Back then (TM) (must have been 1990ies or so) I knew. And I sometimes still
miss the "easy interactivity". I haven't investigated whether there is an
equivalent socat mode (say line-mode with readline editing or something). That
would be a market niche, wouldn't it?

Cheers
-- 
t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: