Re: Telnet
On Sun, 3 Dec 2023 17:00:44 +0100
Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> wrote:
> >
> > How do you find 1994? It seems to be a mail from yesterday:
>
> For me it sounded like a joke.
>
> Telnet is unencrypted (although it is possible to run it over TLS to
> encrypt it) and SSH exists more than 20 years.
True. None the less, there is at least one perfectly good use for
telnet: testing connections to servers.
charles@hawk:~$ telnet hawk
Trying 127.0.1.1...
telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
charles@hawk:~$ telnet hawk 80
Trying 127.0.1.1...
Connected to hawk.localdomain.
Escape character is '^]'.
^]
telnet> quit
Connection closed.
charles@hawk:~$
The first attempt shows that hawk does not have a telnet server on the
default port. The second shows that it does have a server of some sort
on port 80, which is assigned to http.
--
Does anybody read signatures any more?
https://charlescurley.com
https://charlescurley.com/blog/
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Telnet
- From: Greg Wooledge <greg@wooledge.org>
- Re: Telnet
- From: Nicolas George <george@nsup.org>
- References:
- Telnet
- From: William Torrez Corea <willitc9888@gmail.com>
- Re: Telnet
- From: Andy Smith <andy@strugglers.net>
- Re: Telnet
- From: Michel Verdier <mv524@free.fr>
- Re: Telnet
- From: Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de>