[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Processors older than Intel Pentium 4



Le dimanche 17 juillet 2022 à 07:40:05 UTC+2, Timothy M Butterworth a écrit :
> On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 12:30 AM Marco <mo...@posteo.de> wrote:
> Am Sat, 16 Jul 2022 11:26:44 -0400
> schrieb Timothy M Butterworth <timothy.m....@gmail.com>:
> 
> > Is anyone running Debian 11 on a processor older than Pentium 4? I ask
> > because I would like to bump 32 bit OS support from i386 (1985) to
> > i686 Pentium 4 and newer.
> 
> It would be interesting what the benefit of that is. You may compile
> amd64 packages with support for SSE, SSE2, etc., this won't break
> something, but for i386 (only a small amount of computers really needs
> that) this will make many of the current usages of i386 impossible.
> All thanks for the responses but the situation is mute. Debian already migrated to i686 as the minimum supported version a few years ago. i686 supports Pentium 3 which is the oldest processor in use on this thread. Some internet sites say that i686 is Pentium 4 and later others say that it is Pentium 2 or later. Others say that i686 is Pentium Pro version 2 and later. If it is indeed Pentium Pro and later then a lot of older processors are still supported: Pentium 2, Pentium 3, Pentium M, Celeron, Pentium 4 etc.
> -- 
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian - The universal operating system
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://www.debian.org/
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀

Hello,

Wikipedia states that the P6 (aka i686) line starts with the Pentium Pro:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_CPU_microarchitectures#32-bit_(IA-32)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P6_(microarchitecture)

That is confirmed by Intel own doc (Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures
Software Developer’s Manual):
https://d2pgu9s4sfmw1s.cloudfront.net/UAM/Prod/Done/a062E00001UMCFmQAP/6d880c8b-2e3a-44ff-9915-0eb627584855?Expires=1658045234&Key-Pair-Id=APKAJKRNIMMSNYXST6UA&Signature=Nk6FAwzRAhgXWfEkT7PHxHckS4alDVsDYd5i7kUPdkiRAyVCiPBycIPgnYYPoWXEgVaT3oURcGyVj-j1mDT8TcfschC1Hsj9S6sxCQ0U~juM1Qr3g5KqedfMSkZCvps2nI5xu4PupAU83d6HrWXq4cXVAQIO79o3IROj7YeWYZjV6EwhtajcM55xoFUN3Rh8rYuGBr59wxm13J~FZLhoZHzt23Gis5oEMDUDGIPyh240tFUI9uVsc2y7mD9mhL4mEk5e2X00lYemgrDyJmhCzebVinNSwByCs09qQflEqlRIVAzmQVE57POL3opkYvQQEWHYsUzflX9yXKNV5J9~Mw__


Reply to: