Re: packages built with golang

[Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com>]

tomas@tuxteam.de wrote:

> No, it seems you haven't understood.
> ....

  I assure you that I do understand the need 
  for access to the Built-Using list. 

  What I don't understand is the necessity
  to transmit a string of 3933 bytes
  for 87 golang packages for example 
  when a link to the same would suffice 
  for those that actually require it.

  As a casual user only perusing package information
  for an introductory cursory look,
  a list entailing that level of detail 
  doesn't seem to be necessary. 


-- 
Stanley C. Kitching
Human Being
Phoenix, Arizona