Re: packages built with golang

[Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com>]

Dan Ritter wrote:

> ....
> Not having Built-Using is just like not having dependencies.

  Thanks for the explanation.

  I can understand the need for the Built-Using list
  for the developers that need it. 

  In cases such as that for the  l o n g  list
  returned for golang built packages like hugo
  perhaps returning a link to the required list
  might work avoiding what Andy Smith
  referred to as information overload 
  and that would save a bit of bandwidth 
  as a bonus since those  l o n g  lists 
  go out to all readers .... :-)
   

-- 
Stanley C. Kitching
Human Being
Phoenix, Arizona