max <maxwillb@mailfence.com> wrote on 24/01/2022 at 06:15:12+0100: > January 23, 2022 11:21:31 AM CET "Pierre-Elliott Bécue" <peb@debian.org> wrote: > >> I wonder if these bugs aren't also impacting chromium? I did not have >> time to look into it so I may be wrong. > > But of course they were. Otherwise why would Debian fix them, after a > long wait? Why would it list them on its security-tracker? Have you > thought of that at all? Have you read the sentence you're quoting at all? >> Now that I read the press release paragraph and the reference to >> Pocock's "excommunication", I start wondering if Max, who never >> wrote on any Debian List before last month is yet another trollesque >> incarnation of the forementioned Pocock. > > M-W defines it as "exclusion from fellowship in a group or community", > so I think that word was perfect. It seems odd of you to question my > command of English, all things considered. The cambridge dictionary defines it as "the act of refusing to to allow someone to be involved in the Church". I don't know what M-W stands for, but for English definitions, I'll stick with Cambridge University Press' work. > And no, I'm not Pocock. He seems to be obsessed with certain alleged > misdeeds of sexual nature. I never brought those up. Your accusation > is baseless. Wondering is not accusing. > And if I were Pocock, what would be the master plan, according to you? > Get more people to try to learn about who the heck he is? Debian has > already done that. I didn't know about who this guy was until I read > that press release and googled him. Talk about the Streisand > effect. So, again, what was the plan, according to you? How would I know? I'm not on anyone's head except mine. -- PEB
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature