On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 08:46:35PM -0400, Celejar wrote:
Do you really mean that in the open source world, there is - and should be - no expectation that a contributor who supplies a patch to a prominent public project that is rejected should receive at least some sort of explanation for the decision to reject it? I respect your opinion, but I would have assumed that basic courtesy and civility, and the open source ethos in general, suggest otherwise.
Of course it would be polite to offer a response and I think most maintainers in most circumstances would do so. But volunteer time is limited and one can't demand a volunteer spend their time on anything. -- Please do not CC me for listmail. 👱🏻 Jonathan Dowland ✎ jmtd@debian.org 🔗 https://jmtd.net