[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Firefox HTTPS-only mode breaks sites that return 404 for HTTPS connections



On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 16:01:13 -0300
riveravaldez <riveravaldezmail@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4/14/21, Celejar <celejar@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I recently switched to Firefox's native HTTPS-Only mode from the
> > HTTPS Everywhere extension, and I've just made the nasty discovery that
> > a bunch of links that had been returning 404, which I had been assuming
> > were dead links, were actually perfectly valid pages, which Firefox had
> > been "upgrading" to HTTPS, and then getting 404s from web servers that
> > weren't offering them via HTTPS (but still apparently accepting
> > connections via HTTPS). Clicking on the little lock icon and turning
> > HTTPS-Only mode off for the website doesn't seem to have any effect -
> > the only thing that lets me actually access these pages is turning off
> > HTTPS-Only mode via the general Settings page (or about:config).
> >
> > When the website doesn't offer HTTPS at all, then Firefox offers to
> > connect via HTTP, after a warning, and that's fine. But having pages
> > become completely inaccessible is intolerable - I now have to check
> > every 404 I get by turning off HTTPS-Only mode and seeing if the
> > page is actually there. Am I missing something here, or is HTTPS-Only
> > mode just badly broken?
> >
> > https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2020/11/17/firefox-83-introduces-https-only-mode/
> > https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25121604
> >
> > Celejar
> 
> Not sure if useful at all, but I've been using firefox-release (just running
> the binary from Mozilla) as main browser for years, and enabled HTTPS-
> Only Mode upon HTTPS Everywhere add-on/extension simply because
> I had it installed and I was letting it be (?). And that (unexpected?)
> combination seems to work fine (in comparison with your case). Maybe
> you want to try it just to avoid that extra-work until a proper
> solution appears...

Thanks. Perhaps I'll try that.

Celejar


Reply to: