Re: mdadm usage

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: mdadm usage
From: basti <mailinglist@unix-solution.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2020 09:36:04 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 1cd077e9-13b3-e2fd-dbf6-c597ac14c97b@unix-solution.de>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 95aa58c0-92ac-19d7-a288-d047ddfaa1b6@earthlink.net>
References: <[🔎] cad65c77-257b-4d5f-5d29-1b4d7a6af384@little-beak.com> <[🔎] 95aa58c0-92ac-19d7-a288-d047ddfaa1b6@earthlink.net>

On a file server in a production environment I would prefer raid 6.

Am 29.12.20 um 08:45 schrieb Felix Miata:
> Thomas A. Anderson composed on 2020-12-29 07:58 (UTC+0100):
> 
>> I have been "using" mdadm to run software raid1 (stripping) on a file
>> server i have been running.
> 
> RAID 1 is two devices that are mirrors of each other, redundancy, with some loss
> in speed. Loose one device, and you still have all your data.
> 
> RAID 0 is striping. One device failing means all data lost from two devices, but
> twice as much space as RAID 1, and some extra speed.
>

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: mdadm usage
  - From: "Thomas A. Anderson" <thomas.anderson@little-beak.com>
- Re: mdadm usage
  - From: Dan Ritter <dsr@randomstring.org>

References:
- mdadm usage
  - From: "Thomas A. Anderson" <thomas.anderson@little-beak.com>
- Re: mdadm usage
  - From: Felix Miata <mrmazda@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: mdadm usage
Next by Date: Re: No GRUB with brand-new GPU
Previous by thread: Re: mdadm usage
Next by thread: Re: mdadm usage
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread