[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Is there permissve GPL3 compatible license ?



On Wed, Aug 19, 2020 at 02:09:01PM +0200, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:
> W dniu śro, 19.08.2020 o godzinie 08∶05 +0200, użytkownik
> tomas@tuxteam.de napisał:
> > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 09:17:36PM +0200, Marek Mosiewicz wrote:

[...]

> > The thing is: BSD, MIT and friends allow you to combine the stuff
> > with any other program and relicense the result as you wish (e.g.
> > proprietary). This includes a GPL work. The result is, then, GPL.
> BSD and MIT allows you to combine it with other work I agree [...]

I think Thomas answered that part well.

Moreover, just have a look at the diagram in the reference [2]
I linked to in my last answer.

[...]

> > The patent grant in Apache2 is why the FSF recommends this one
> > among the non-copyleft [4] licenses.
> > 
> Is it GPL3 compatible ?

Yes. Again, see the diagram in [2].

Cheers

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License_compatibility#Compatibility_of_FOSS_licenses

 - t

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: