Re: off-topic: URIBL_BLACK
"Thomas Schmitt" <scdbackup@gmx.net> writes:
> Hi,
>
> 황병희 wrote:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.4 required=4.0 [...]URIBL_BLACK[...]
>> [...]
>> i got URIBL_BLACK score in SpamAssassin.
>
> Grrr. Why are spam slanderers and virus scammers allowed to interfere
> with Debian ?
> Debian 10 installs a Firefox which accuses Debian ISOs of being malware
> and now our mailing list asks URIBL about the reputation of people's ISPs.
>
> http://uribl.com/faq.shtml
> "Can you tell me why my domain is blacklisted?
> No. [...]"
>
> I did not find a page yet where they would sell permissions to spam.
> But an honest libel service is nearly as bad as a bribable one.
>
> We cannot stop them, but we should not support them by including their
> info in spam decisions of Debian lists.
>
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
You save me from dark side force. Thank you! Thomas^^^
Sicnerely, Byung-Hee
--
^고맙습니다 _地平天成_ 감사합니다_^))//
Reply to: