Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]
Hi.
On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 07:45:57AM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 10:52:57AM +0100, Brad Rogers wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Jul 2020 11:28:21 +0200
> > <tomas@tuxteam.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hello tomas@tuxteam.de,
> >
> > >I skip this newline. It's a quirk. I expect a teaspoon or two of
> >
> > Quirks are fine, when things continue to work. Your sig separator fails
> > completely.
>
> "Fails" in what way? He doesn't actually have a "signature file".
> He doesn't have a signature separator ("-- \n") followed by a signature
> message. He simply uses "-- t\n\n" at the end of each email.
>
> You're not missing out on any content.
It's a kmail thing. mutt, being a superior MUA, is not affected.
Reco
Reply to:
- References:
- BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...
- From: Albretch Mueller <lbrtchx@gmail.com>
- Re: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...
- From: Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk>
- Re: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...
- From: Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi>
- Re: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...
- From: Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk>
- Re: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...
- Re: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...
- From: Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk>
- Re: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...
- From: Andrei POPESCU <andreimpopescu@gmail.com>
- Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]
- Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]
- From: Brad Rogers <brad@fineby.me.uk>
- Re: Signature [was: BIOS time fine, Linux/Debian's isn't! ...]
- From: Greg Wooledge <wooledg@eeg.ccf.org>