[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Lenovo S205 boot



On 2020-07-29 21:38, Russell L. Harris wrote:
On an older Lenovo S205 on which I never have managed to get Debian
running, I did a netinstall of
debian-bullseye-DI-alpha2-amd64-netinst.iso

grub dummy failed, but the boot process terminates with the grub>
prompt.  I tried the ls command:

grub> ls
(proc) (hd0) (hd0,gpt3) (hd0,gpt2) (hd0,pt1)

and I am able to boot manually by typing in grub commands:

grub> root=(hd0,gpt2)
grub> linux /vmlinuz root=dev/sda2
grub> initrd /initrd.img
grub> boot

The boot now proceeds, but the stream of messages terminates with the
line:

IPV6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp2so: link becomes ready

and the GUI interface does not start.  However, ALT-F1 brings up a
terminal with a login prompt, and I am able to log into the system.
Curiously, the "shutdown" command is not recognized.

The netinstall used a approx mirror here in my LAN.  I did an expert
install, but I allowed the installer to auto-configure the network.
I am not using IPV6; the LAN gateway address is 192.168.1.1.

Inasmuch as I used the approx mirror, re-installation would be easy,
if that is the easiest way to resolve the difficulty.

That hardware is getting old -- ca. 2011:

https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/laptops/lenovo/s-series/s205/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AMD_Accelerated_Processing_Unit


I am finding that Debian and/or Linux have issues on my older hardware.


If you have a machine with a working installation of:

    debian-bullseye-DI-alpha2-amd64-netinst.iso


Boot it and see what message follows the message:

    IPV6: ADDRCONF(NETDEV_CHANGE): enp2so: link becomes ready


My guess is that whatever follows is the problem on the Lenovo S205. Perhaps you can boot the installer into a rescue shell, mount the root partition read-write, and fix or work-around the problem.


What happens if you install current Debian Stable?


What if you install older versions of Debian?

    https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/


David


Reply to: