Re: Slic3r --gui won't run
On Sunday 19 July 2020 12:32:40 Reco wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 12:19:02PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > On Sunday 19 July 2020 10:32:12 Reco wrote:
> > > On Sun, Jul 19, 2020 at 10:28:08AM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote:
> > > > Whats my sources.list suposed to look like?
> > >
> > > One of the possible ways of doing it:
> > >
> > > deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian/ stretch main contrib non-free
> > > deb http://security.debian.org/ stretch/updates main contrib
> > > non-free
> >
> > Made it so,
>
> Did you? How many *other* "deb" strings do you have?
> I.e.
>
> grep -R "^deb " /etc/apt/sources.list*
>
> > refreshed synaptic,
>
> For the ease of troubleshooting do not use this. Please use
> conventional "apt-get"
>
I am slowly learning that but its the only gui package manager I can
usually trust, I've had aptitude destroy an install by essentially
formatting the disk 4 damned times now and it will never get another
chance. It follows dependencies until the disk is blanked and there is
no stopping it once it decides to clean house. No response to anything
you do from the keyboard, only the power switch or system reset, all 4
of which have only been recovered from by a re-install followed by
several hours of amrecover.
Now apt-get is bitching because it thinks I'm asking for version 3.0.3
but only 3.0.4 stuff is available:
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
libalien-wxwidgets-perl : Depends: libwxgtk3.0-dev (< 3.0.3~) but
3.0.4+dfsg-4~bpo9+1 is to be installed
Depends: libwxgtk-media3.0-dev (< 3.0.3~) but
3.0.4+dfsg-4~bpo9+1 is to be installed
E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.
WHAT IS THE NAME OF THE BROKEN PACKAGE????????????????????????????
> Reco
Cheers, Gene Heskett
--
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
If we desire respect for the law, we must first make the law respectable.
- Louis D. Brandeis
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>
Reply to: