Thanks for your response, Tomas. We're good. e-mail has never been a great tool for communicating exact meanings. And that it does not work without the Internet, which is a great distraction to mental processes (a much studied effect in years to come) does not make it any easy.On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 08:22:49PM +0200, Seeds Notoneofmy wrote: [...]Nothing like beating a dead horse for some, it seems.Uh... I'm genuinely sorry if I came across like that. I was mainly writing that for the benefit of others who might fall into the same trap. I tried to wrap the message with some humor -- not to poke fun at you or at anyone, but rather to make things more digestible. It seems I failed miserably at it. What can I say?
We're all good. I consider the matter peacefully resolved. And thanks for being 'man' about it!I already, very clearly, noted in response to Anders: "sorry to all." In any society, virtual or otherwise, that will do it, assuming of course, you bothered to read: *"**Thank you. I will do that next time. Sorry to everyone."* Besides a very clear apology, I do not know what else was expected. Nor, can I understand the 'rants,' given the apology. However, some resources from David were very helpful, particularly, " http://catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html" And thanks, David, no offense taken.You are right. No, I wasn't expecting any apology from you. Please, accept my apologies.
Cheers -- t