Re: Jitsi can be built
On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 02:17:27PM +0100, John ff wrote:
> A local member of the LUG here built jitsi from sources and he is not
> an IT professional. From that I infer that it is possible.
I will assume that the build process was similar to described at .
A quick look at so-called "sources", i.e.  reveals us:
1) Multiple *jar files of unknown content.
2) Pre-built *so files without sources, and without any visible
3) Build-dependency on non-free Oracle JDK and pre-built Apache ANT.
4) Possible (too lazy to check it) arbitrary file downloads during the
build process - ant in (in)famous for it.
Proper building from the source would require (some steps omitted for
1) Building openjdk from the source (Debian does it, so that's easy).
2) Building ant from the source (ditto).
3) Re-building all those *jar blobs (possible, given that those are
popular java libraries).
4) Re-building from the source all those *so files.
5) Fixing build.xml to prevent it from downloading random *jars from all
the Internet (may be impossible).
6) De-composing the resulting *jar(s) and replacing bundled *jars with
proper Debian dependencies.
And last, but not least:
7) Repeat build process once jitsi source is updated.
Points from 3 to 7 inclusive require one to be an "IT professional" IMO.
Somehow I doubt that aforementioned local member of LUG followed the
latter process, most possibly it was former. I.e. - not real BTS at all.