Re: Buster without systemd?
kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca) writes:
> deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> writes:
>> Kamil Jońca wrote:
>>> But always try :) systemd-resolved also.
>>>
>>> I lost a lot of time struggling with systemd-resoved (I wasn't aware of
>>> its existence), guessing why my dnsmasq stopped working properly.
>>>
>>> I simply like unix approach ("do one thing") and systemd is against it.
>>
>> I think you just did not want to read the documentation before trying it.
> As I said: I did not know that systemd-resolved install with some
> upgrade, and then takes my dns resolving.
Because it doesn't.
> When I realised existence of it, I turned it off immediately.
Then you must have enabled it first.
> And my task:
>
> How can I configure resolved to do something like:
> eth - interface
> tun1 - interface to vpn1 with domains a, b, c
> tun2 - interface to vpn2 with domains d, e
>
> I want to resolve domains a,b,c with dns server in vpn1 and domains d,e
> with server in vpn2.
>
> Can I do it with resolved?
+---
| Domains=: A whitespace-separated list of domains which should be
| resolved using the DNS servers on this link.
+---
sounds like it might be what you want.
Ansgar
Reply to: