Re: Buster without systemd?
- To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Buster without systemd?
- From: kjonca@poczta.onet.pl (Kamil Jońca)
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 18:03:47 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87k1398z2k.fsf@alfa.kjonca>
- In-reply-to: <zNSzo-7kf-3@gated-at.bofh.it> (deloptes@gmail.com's message of "Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:20:02 +0100")
- References: <zNRtE-6H2-7@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNRtE-6H2-9@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNRtE-6H2-11@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNRtE-6H2-13@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNRtE-6H2-15@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNRtE-6H2-17@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNRtE-6H2-19@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNRtE-6H2-5@gated-at.bofh.it> <zNSzo-7kf-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
deloptes <deloptes@gmail.com> writes:
> Kamil Jońca wrote:
>
>> But always try :) systemd-resolved also.
>>
>> I lost a lot of time struggling with systemd-resoved (I wasn't aware of
>> its existence), guessing why my dnsmasq stopped working properly.
>>
>> I simply like unix approach ("do one thing") and systemd is against it.
>
> I think you just did not want to read the documentation before trying it.
As I said: I did not know that systemd-resolved install with some
upgrade, and then takes my dns resolving. When I realised existence of
it, I turned it off immediately.
And my task:
How can I configure resolved to do something like:
eth - interface
tun1 - interface to vpn1 with domains a, b, c
tun2 - interface to vpn2 with domains d, e
I want to resolve domains a,b,c with dns server in vpn1 and domains d,e
with server in vpn2.
Can I do it with resolved?
KJ
--
http://stopstopnop.pl/stop_stopnop.pl_o_nas.html
Reply to: