Re: Ethernet trouble

To: elvis <elvis@dogonfire.com>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Ethernet trouble
From: Klaus Singvogel <deb-user-ml@singvogel.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 10:37:21 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20200129093721.GA11095@singvogel.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 98117d53-a2bb-fbe9-f6f3-8b0038363adb@dogonfire.com>
References: <[🔎] dc507a27-cf56-61cd-b132-1d211f900100@slsware.net> <[🔎] 20200129074836.GA8235@singvogel.net> <[🔎] 98117d53-a2bb-fbe9-f6f3-8b0038363adb@dogonfire.com>

elvis wrote:
> It sounds like it is already using the consistent interface names.

It's even possible to name the devices after their MAC addresses.
Then it might be possible to identify them uniqly, on the other hand,
he will get long device names (enx78e7d1ea46da).

Didn't use this method by myself ever, no experience, so I'm pointing him
to this solution only.

Another way of naming is the troditional way: eth0.

Best regards,
	Klaus.
-- 
Klaus Singvogel
GnuPG-Key-ID: 1024R/5068792D  1994-06-27

Reply to:

References:
- Ethernet trouble
  - From: ghe <ghe@slsware.net>
- Re: Ethernet trouble
  - From: Klaus Singvogel <deb-user-ml@singvogel.net>
- Re: Ethernet trouble
  - From: elvis <elvis@dogonfire.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Re: Sudo
Next by Date: Re: Sudo
Previous by thread: Re: Ethernet trouble
Next by thread: Re: Ethernet trouble
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread