Re: Dependencies et al (was: Default Debian install harassed me)
On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:59:31 +0300, Reco wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:50:28PM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 14:11:15 +0300, Reco wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 11:39:05AM +0100, Brian wrote:
> > > > On Mon 07 Oct 2019 at 11:28:03 +0300, Reco wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > PS Just a friendly reminder. Please check for the existence of that
> > > > > LDOSUBSCRIBER value of X-Spam-Status e-mail header *before* replying to
> > > > > e-mail. Unless, of course, you intention is *not* to reply to OP but
> > > > > have your reply visible to the list.
> > > >
> > > > The non-existence of LDOSUBSCRIBER in a mails's headers says nothing
> > > > definite about whether the poster is subscribed to the list or reads
> > > > list mails.
> > >
> > > You'll excuse me if I take your suggestion with a grain of salt.
> > > Just on a basis of your past statements about SMTP protocol.
> >
> > What does the lack of LDOSUBSCRIBER tell us?
>
> Clearly there are several people that are using ad44@cityscape.co.uk e-mail.
> Please share the answer to this question once all of you reach some conclusion.
Your theorising is interesting and doesn't really answer the question.
That address is not subscribed to the list and plays no part in routeing
mails to or from the list.
--
Brian.
Reply to: